Monday, March 18, AD 2024 10:36pm

PopeWatch: Cardinal Newman

0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Paterson-Seymour
Michael Paterson-Seymour
Thursday, August 25, AD 2016 9:47am

“…whether he was right or wrong in his opinion, and, if wrong, although he had not taken proper pains to get at the truth of the matter.”
One recalls the well-know episode at the time of Napoléon’s marriage to Marie-Louise, Archduchess of Austria. Cardinal della Somaglia told M. Emery, Supérieur of St. Sulpice and a notable moral theologian that he could not attend without wounding his conscience. M. Emery told him that, in that case, he should on no account do so, for any consideration whatsoever.
It transpired that M. Emery had been consulted by a number of the other 18 cardinals, then in Paris, and he had told them he thought they could attend the ceremony with a clear conscience.
In response to a letter from Cardinal Fesch, the Emperor’s uncle, M. Emery explained this apparent inconsistency. He personally saw no harm in attending, but he had given his advice to Cardinal della Somaglia on the basis that one should never act against one’s own conscience, even if it were erroneous [qu’on ne devait jamais, agir contre sa conscience, même erronée].
In the event Cardinal della Somaglia kept to his view, contrary to M. Emery, and did not attend the marriage ceremony.

Michael Dowd
Michael Dowd
Thursday, August 25, AD 2016 11:36am

Agree, of course. But it must be a well formed Catholic conscience if we are to transgress an order from a priest, Bishop or Pope. Most of the transgressing that goes on now-a-days is from a morally deformed conscience, e.g., use of contraception. Unfortunately, many in the clergy have ill formed consciences themselves as we see from experience, especially since Vatican II. Folks who follow an ill formed conscience are committing a sin as doctrine supersedes conscience.

Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Thursday, August 25, AD 2016 11:56am

My first reaction upon a quick reading: Don’t let Nancy Pelosi et. al. know about this.
.
Seeing how the righly formed is so often elided from the primacy of conscience these days.

Michael Paterson-Seymour
Michael Paterson-Seymour
Thursday, August 25, AD 2016 12:27pm

“Ernst Schreiber wrote, “seeing how the righly formed is so often elided from the primacy of conscience these days.”

But that in no way detracts from the duty, on which M Emery insisted, “that one should never act against one’s own conscience, even if it were erroneous.”

As Bl John Henry Newman explains it, “Of course, if a man is culpable in being in error, which he might have escaped, had he been more in earnest, for that error he is answerable to God, but still he must act according to that error, while he is in it, because he in full sincerity thinks the error to be truth.”

Wagon-loads of authorities could be produced in support of this proposition; many theologians hold it to be de fide, citing the Fourth Lateran Council, “‘Quidquid fit contra conscientiam, ædificat ad gehennam” [He who acts against his conscience loses his soul]

Sydney O Fernandes
Sydney O Fernandes
Friday, August 26, AD 2016 1:06pm

How many know there is a “conscience” or can desribe it? Nowadays the trigger for action is “I feel good about it!” and it gets done. Genteel discussions about “informed” conscience is fine, but who is teaching the faithful? Pondering on this only throws in sharper relief how much we depend on Christ’s mercy, and how His heart must bleed for us.

Sydney O Fernandes
Sydney O Fernandes
Friday, August 26, AD 2016 1:09pm

Am correcting my e-mail address: previous “s-fernan@yahoo.com is an error

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top