Monday, March 18, AD 2024 11:31pm

How To Write For the National Catholic Reporter

 

 

National Catholic Fishwrap

 

 

Christopher Johnson, a non-Catholic, demonstrates yet again why I long ago designated him Defender of the Faith:

 

A continuing series

Thank you for your interest in writing for the National Catholic Reporter.  Although we welcome your submissions at any time, we hope that these occasional posts help you to become exactly the sort of writer NCR is looking for.  The following piece by Robert McClory illustrates two key abilities every great NCR writer needs to learn how to perform well.  The first of these is how to:

Play dumber than a bag of hammers – Commenting on a recent column by Cardinal Francis George of the Archdiocese of Chicago in which George said this:

Now, George says, “society has brought social and legislative approval to all types of sexual relationships that used to be considered ‘sinful.’ Since the biblical vision of what it means to be human tells us that not every friendship or love can be expressed in sexual relations, the church’s teaching on these issues is now evidence of intolerance for what the civil law upholds and even imposes. What was once a request to live and let live has now become a demand for approval. The ‘ruling class,’ those who shape public opinion in politics, in education, in communications, in entertainment, is using the civil law to impose its own form of morality on everyone.”

McClory responds:

I don’t understand what George is saying. If many states pass, for example, approval of gay marriage, aren’t Catholics free to oppose it in keeping with official church teaching, just as they are free to oppose the sale of contraceptives in drug stores? If the government requires insurance policies to cover the purchase of contraceptives, are not Catholics free to object, as George has done for months? But I don’t see how any of this amounts to a “ruling class” imposing “its own form of morality on everyone.”

The simple fact of that matter is that, unless he is too stupid to be allowed outside without supervision, McClory knows perfectly well what George means.  But McClory has to pretend that he doesn’t; otherwise, he must explain why being governmentally coerced into committing a sin is fine as long as you’re free to feel bad about it as well as why being governmentally coerced into sin isn’t “imposing morality.”

The second ability any good NCR writer needs to know particularly well is how to:

Duck the questionCardinal George continues.

“It means that those who choose to live by the Catholic faith,” [George] says, “will not be welcomed as political candidates to national office, will not sit on editorial boards of major newspapers, will not be at home on most university faculties, will not have successful careers as actors and entertainers. Nor will their children, who will also be suspect. Since all public institutions, no matter who owns or operates them, will be agents of the government and conform their activities to the demands of the official religion, the practice of medicine and law will become more difficult for faithful Catholics. It already means in some States that those who run businesses must conform their activities to the official religion or be fined, as Christians and Jews are fined for their religion in countries governed by Sharia law.”

One assumes that McClory knows that George’s last sentence has already happened several times since several private businesses have been driven into bankruptcy by the legal assaults of homosexuals.  One also assumes that McClory remembers the Chick-Fil-A controversy of a while back in which the homosexual community as well as several prominent politicians publicly execrated Chick-Fil-A and wished for its destruction simply because its CEO opposed the concept of homosexual “marriage.”

Assuming that McClory knows all this, how does he respond?  Like any great National Catholic Reporter writer would.

I hope some of George’s clearer-thinking colleagues would gather around their partner and urge him to consider a more positive, optimistic future for Catholicism. Is not the Holy Spirit still among us?

Go here to read the comments.  Brilliant Christopher, absolutely brilliant!

0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mary De Voe
Wednesday, September 17, AD 2014 3:24pm

“Brilliant Christopher, absolutely brilliant!”
Amen

T. Shaw
T. Shaw
Wednesday, September 17, AD 2014 3:39pm

Write for the National Catholic Reporter as if you don’t want to be read.

trackback
Thursday, September 18, AD 2014 12:02am

[…]   How to Write for the National Catholic Reporter […]

CAM
CAM
Thursday, September 18, AD 2014 12:36pm

I have no Irish blood in my veins, but I am a Catholic. I followed the link and read Cardinal’s response to criticism. I still believe many will perceive his participation as a change in the Church’s teaching on homosexual sex which in turn leads some to think that the definition of marriage is not just for the union of man and woman (or to be precise one man and one woman). Is it a coincidence that the year a prelate of the Church is asked and accepts the invitation to be parade marshall, the committee then changes its policy to allow an organization that identifies itself as Irish and homosexual? Oh and uses a major network and news organiztion in its title? Methinks not. Cardinal Dolan, stand by to see what your decision has wrought.

CAM
CAM
Thursday, September 18, AD 2014 12:41pm

If I have the sequence of events correct, the cardinal was set up.

CAM
CAM
Thursday, September 18, AD 2014 12:49pm

This is not the first time the cardinal has been snookered. Remember Obama’s Obamacare assurances (lies) to Cardinal Dolan.

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top