Friday, April 19, AD 2024 11:04pm

Benghazi Betrayal

 

 

Sharryl Attkisson, who left CBS News because of their unwillingness to report on news harmful to the Obama administration, reports on the attempt by the Obama administration to intentionally lie to the American people about the Benghazi attack:

 

Newly-released documents reveal direct White House involvement in steering the public narrative about the September 11, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya, toward that of a spontaneous protest that never happened.

One of the operative documents, which the government had withheld from
​Congress and reporters for a year and a half, is an internal September 14,
​2012 email to White House press officials from Ben Rhodes, President Obama’s
​Assistant and Deputy National Security Advisor. (Disclosure:Ben Rhodes
​is the brother of David Rhodes, the President of CBS News, where I
was employed until March.)

In the email, Ben Rhodes lists as a “goal” the White House desire “To
​underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a
broader failure or policy.”

The email is entitled, “RE: PREP CALL with Susan, Saturday at 4:00 pm ET”
and refers to White House involvement in preparing then-U.S.Ambassador
to the U.N. Susan Rice for her upcoming appearance on Sunday television
​ network political talk shows.

The Rhodes email states that another “goal” is “To reinforce the President and Administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.”

A court compelled the release of the documents, which were heavily-redacted, to the conservative watchdog group JudicialWatch, which has sued the government over its failed Freedom of Information responses. I have also requested Benghazi-related documents under Freedom of Information law, but the government has only produced a few pages to date.

Today, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) called the Rhodes email the “smoking gun” showing the “political manipulation by the White House” after the attacks.

Go here to read the rest.  We have never been had a more contemptible and mendacious administration than the Obama administration.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Wednesday, April 30, AD 2014 7:51pm

We never merited this much contempt and mendacity before either.

Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Wednesday, April 30, AD 2014 9:43pm

The fools have us outnumbered Donald. Our guilt lies in the fact we let that happen.

Anyway, it was meant more as an allusion to Franklin, seeing as we’ve just about reached the point “when the People shall become so corrupt as to need Despotic Government, being incapable of any other[.]”

Art Deco
Art Deco
Thursday, May 1, AD 2014 7:40am

I think his approval ratings were slightly lower in the fall of 2011 during one of the Euro-convulsions. The man is an indicator of loss of seriousness among the political class and populace alike, so sinking approval ratings are to be welcomed as one might falling temperature during a fever.

Tito Edwards
Admin
Thursday, May 1, AD 2014 10:08am

Disturbing to know that this man was voted in mostly because of his skin color and not about the content of his character, which is a mile wide and an inch deep.

Ernst Schreiber
Ernst Schreiber
Thursday, May 1, AD 2014 12:24pm

Obama’s always struck me as both narrow and shallow. But I’ll concede he can fake an appearance of broadness, whatever we mean by that.
.
And letting our Republic devolve into, and remain, a democracy is exactly where our collective guilt resides.

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top