Friday, April 19, AD 2024 2:44pm

2012 Election: The House

With it being a presidential election year, it is easy to lose track of the fact that there is an institution called Congress. You may not have heard, but as is the case every two years, approximately one-third of the Senate and all 435 House seats are up for election. I hope to look at the Senate races in the coming week, but this post is for the House of Representatives.

The least suspenseful aspect of the 2012 election are the House races. Certainly there is some drama within individual races, but in the aggregate, the Democratic chances of recapturing the House are somewhere between slim and are you kidding me. Real Clear Politics already has the GOP at 226 seats with lean-R and likely-R districts, with an additional 26 races listed as toss-ups. No matter what happens with the presidential election, Republican control of the House is a near certainty. The main question with regard to the House is how big will the Republican majority be? Even though the Republicans had an historic mid-term pickup, there were a number of close elections that Republicans lost in 2010, many of them in districts favorable to Republicans. Throw in post-census re-districting, and the GOP should retain a fairly strong majority.

I’m not going to go into detail into every tossup race. Consider this an open invitation for those of you either in swing districts or neighboring swing districts to inform us how things are shaping up in your neck of the woods.

I’ll kick things off by taking a look at the People’s Republic of Maryland. Currently two of Maryland’s eight House districts are held by Republicans, which is just too many for the overwhelming Democratic majority in the state. In attempt to knock off the longest-serving Republican – Roscoe Bartlett in the sixth district – the Democrats drew up a laughably gerrymandered map. This is actually a map of Maryland’s 8th district, currently served by Democrat and Nancy Pelosi lackey Chris Van Hollen (click on 2012 map). What they’ve done is place a part of heavily Reublican Frederick County in the northern part of the state and magically patched it with Maoist Montgomery County to the south. At one point the district basically just runs up I-270. The area to the west is the sixth district, which now combines portions of Montgomery County with the more conservative northwest section of the state. In other words, they’ve taken one heavily Democratic district and one Republican district and converted them into two Democratic-leaning districts. The gerrymander is so ridiculous that it is one of the five major state-wide ballot initiatives in Maryland. (Even if the voters decide to reject the altered districts, those elected will serve the districts as currently designed for the next term, and the Democrats just get to re-draw the lines).

Bartlett is facing challenger Joe Delaney, and things do not look good for Bartlett. It would be the ultimate justice if instead of ousting Bartlett, the re-drawn eight district winds up in the Republican column. Ken Timmerman is challenging Van Hollen, and has drawn the support of luminaries such as John Bolton. The district is now “only” 50% Democrat, which means that instead of this being a lock-solid Democrat district, it’s just a very strong Democrat district. Timmerman is going to have to pull a lot of independents to have any chance, but stranger things have happened. In the end, it looks like the state of Maryland will be a net pickup of one for the Democrats.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Donald R. McClarey
Admin
Tuesday, October 16, AD 2012 6:25am

In Illinois the GOP holds a majority of the House Seats, but the Democrats completely controlled redistricting thanks to controlling the General Assembly and the Governorship. As a result we have the worst gerrymandered House districts in the country, all of them set up to enhance Democrat chances.

http://www.championnews.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/IL2011_Congressional.png

http://www.humanevents.com/2011/06/05/gerrymander-endangers-nearly-all-house-gopers-in-illinois/

All of the seriously contested races are tight, but I suspect that all the Republican incumbents are going to hang on:

http://capitolfax.com/2012/10/12/poll-all-six-congressional-races-super-tight/

Three reasons:
1. All of the Gop candidates are well-funded.
2. Both Governor Quinn and President Obama are heartily despised in Republican areas and I am predicting a record GOP turnout as a result.
3. Many of the Democrat challengers are just not very good. Democrat Tammy Duckworth taking on Joe Walsh for example. On paper she looks great: double amputee war veteran of raq. As a candidate however she is a disaster and Walsh, who has his own baggage, has been campaigning non-stop and I think will pull another upset as he did when he took out Melissa Bean to get his seat in 2010.

Elaine Krewer
Admin
Tuesday, October 16, AD 2012 6:49am

Slightly off topic, but here’s an interesting graphic posted by Nate Silver at Five Thirty Eight showing how various states have leaned right or left in presidential elections since 1952 — and how there used to be more swing states than there are today:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/10/15/us/politics/swing-history.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

To see the electoral “path” of a particular state, mouse over the chart. It shows, for example, that Illinois was a swing state at least through the 1970s and only turned sharply left/Democrat about 20 years ago. Illinois did not even come close to voting for its “favorite son” Adlai Stevenson in either ’52 or ’56.

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top