The United Nations, sustainable population development, and the Easter Bunny…
In contrast to the Vatican’s steadfast opposition to the use of artificial means of birth control, the United Nations continues to sound the drumbeat of “sustainable population development,” asserting that it’s nothing short of an “imperative” for the 21st century and cannot be achieved without improving women’s reproductive health. In short, the hypothesis is that reducing fertility ensures economic success.
No one is more convinced of the validity of this hypothesis than is the Executive Director of the United Nations’ Family Planning Agency (UNFPA), Babatunde Osotimehin.
In a February 2012 press release, Osotimehin asserted that reducing fertility through family planning—including free access to contraceptives and abortions—is the key to ensure economic development.
The problem with well-intentioned ideologues like Osotimehin is that they conveniently overlook the demographic facts and economic implications that contradict their hypothesis.
Consider the example of Japan.
Based on a “moderate” interpretation of Japan’s 2010 census in a report published by the Daily Yomiuri Online, by 2060:
- Japan’s population will fall 30% (<90M), with those aged <14 years numbering less than 8M, compared to those aged 65+ who will number 35M (or, 39.9% of Japan’s population).
- Japan’s fertility rate (the expected number of children born per couple) will be 1.35 in 2060, down from 1.39 in 2010 and far below the 2.08 needed to keep Japan’s population from shrinking.
- In 1960, 11.2 workers supported 1 retiree. In 2010, 2.8 workers supported 1retiree. By 2060, 1.3 workers will support 1 retiree.
So, Japan is now confronted with an increasing aging population and a decreasing young population. The economic implications of these demographic facts are nothing short of devastating! Topping the list: What these facts imply for Japan’s social security and taxation systems.
While the Church has been warning about these matters for decades, The Motley Monk was pleased to read an article in ZENIT that the global stock markets are beginning to pick up on the Vatican’s argument and projecting what “sustainable population development” means for almost every developed market.
A strategist for Deutsche Bank in Hong Kong, Ajay Kapur, believes it would be a crucial error for politicians and economists to believe that Japan’s economic stagnation in the last two decades was something unique. Kapur said:
In the next five years, all of the 18 developed countries for which Deutsche has property market data going back more than half a century will see a decline in their working age population ratios.
Kapur then warned that this combination of fewer workers in the labor force and high levels of indebtedness is sure to affect the global economic environment adversely.
Many other nations—for example, Taiwan, the European Union, the United States—are only now beginning to deal with the consequences of near- to below- replacement fertility rates. The President of Taiwan, Ma Ying-jeou, has warned that her nation’s lack of children presents “a serious national security threat.”
As bad as that is, it’s worse yet for Latin America.
Forget the region’s endemic poverty. It’s a region where UNFPA-sponsored programs have proven especially effective in reducing the region’s population. To wit:
- In 1960, Brazil’s fertility rate was 6 children/woman. In 2010, Brazil boasted a lower fertility rate than the United States, at 1.9 children/woman.
- In 2025, 26% of Latin America’s population will be 60+ years old.
The estimated impact on the region will be an even lower standard of living. Considering the region’s overall current standard of living, that’s lower than lower!
The Motley Monk has thought for decades that Pope Paul VI’s encyclical “Humanae vitae” is an infallible pronouncement because, in that document, the Pope presciently forecast some of the implications of what today is called the “birth control mentality.” Despite the data gained in the 45 years since the document’s publication, ideologues continue to assert the hypothesis that reducing fertility ensures economic success.
All The Motley Monk can say in response is “And there’s an Easter Bunny, too.”
To read the ZENIT article, click on the following link:
To read The Motley Monk’s daily blog, click on the following link: