A Defense Department Review has found that doctors overseeing the training of the Fort Hood shooter continually voiced complaints concerning his strident views on Islam and inappropriate behavior. At the same time Nidal Hasan was promoted and received positive performance evaluations.
The Army knew not only that Hassan was a Jihadist sympathizer, but that he was also a substandard doctor:
This report merely confirms what we already knew: there were plenty of red flags about Hasan and no one did anything. No one in Hasan’s chain of command had the courage to step up to the plate and take the necessary steps to get rid of a doctor who was not only manifestly incompetent but who was potentially dangerous. To do so against a Muslim doctor would have risked their careers, and they valued their careers ahead of the troops who would come into contact with Hasan. They gave Hasan glowing reviews so he would be promoted, transferred and be someone else’s problem. Completely contemptible.
“Still, Hasan’s officer evaluation reports were consistently more positive, usually describing his performance as satisfactory and at least twice as outstanding. Known as “OERs,” the reports are used to determine promotions and assignments. The Army promoted Hasan to captain in 2003 and to major in 2009.”
In my day “satisfactory” on an OER (fitrep in those days) was the kiss of death for any career. There was grade inflation in evals and uless one got a fair number of “outstandings” one was not going to get promoted. Perhaps someone was trying to ease out Hasan in the long-haul. Of course not noticing what was going on in the here and now.
Yeesh. A jihadi Frank Burns.
Just what the Army needed.
Brilliant cminor!
“They gave Hasan glowing reviews so he would be promoted, transferred and be someone else’s problem.”
Happened all the time in the navy with women and minorities. No one would risk the label of chauvinist or racist.