Comments on: Commentary on a New York Times Opinion Piece http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/23/commentary-on-a-new-york-times-opinion-piece/ Politics and Culture from a Catholic perspective. Thu, 24 May 2012 14:50:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Dale Price http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/23/commentary-on-a-new-york-times-opinion-piece/#comment-29545 Dale Price Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:51:31 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15110#comment-29545 A quick perusal of the Cambridge person's blog suggests he/she hasn't quite moved on. It reminds me of a guy who always works the fact he's so over his ex-girlfriend into every conversation. Nothing to get upset about. It's a pretty common phenomenon, and you see ex-Catholic fundamentalists doing the same thing all the time. A quick perusal of the Cambridge person’s blog suggests he/she hasn’t quite moved on. It reminds me of a guy who always works the fact he’s so over his ex-girlfriend into every conversation.

Nothing to get upset about. It’s a pretty common phenomenon, and you see ex-Catholic fundamentalists doing the same thing all the time.

]]> By: j. christian http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/23/commentary-on-a-new-york-times-opinion-piece/#comment-29544 j. christian Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:49:39 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15110#comment-29544 Occasionally I peruse the comments of trolls like TheExpatriate for my amusement. They always provide perfect confirmation of my decision to become Catholic. Occasionally I peruse the comments of trolls like TheExpatriate for my amusement. They always provide perfect confirmation of my decision to become Catholic.

]]> By: Joe Hargrave http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/23/commentary-on-a-new-york-times-opinion-piece/#comment-29543 Joe Hargrave Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:15:56 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15110#comment-29543 Unless I'm mistaken, Stupak wasn't originally in the House bill either. It was a fight to get it in there. It could still end up in the Senate bill. It isn't in there now because the Democratic leadership of both the house and the senate is radically pro-abortion. But that isn't necessarily true of the other Democrats. As for you decision to leave, what can I say other than we'll pray for you. If I came back after 10 years of atheistic hatred for the Church, I'm sure your issue can be resolved too. Unless I’m mistaken, Stupak wasn’t originally in the House bill either. It was a fight to get it in there.

It could still end up in the Senate bill. It isn’t in there now because the Democratic leadership of both the house and the senate is radically pro-abortion. But that isn’t necessarily true of the other Democrats.

As for you decision to leave, what can I say other than we’ll pray for you. If I came back after 10 years of atheistic hatred for the Church, I’m sure your issue can be resolved too.

]]> By: TheExpatriate http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/23/commentary-on-a-new-york-times-opinion-piece/#comment-29542 TheExpatriate Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:10:55 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15110#comment-29542 If these women are so far outside of the mainstream, why did the Senate opt not to include Stupak in its version of the bill? Occasionally I peruse these sites for my amusement. They always provide perfect confirmation of my decision to leave Catholicism. If these women are so far outside of the mainstream, why did the Senate opt not to include Stupak in its version of the bill?

Occasionally I peruse these sites for my amusement. They always provide perfect confirmation of my decision to leave Catholicism.

]]> By: DarwinCatholic http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/23/commentary-on-a-new-york-times-opinion-piece/#comment-29541 DarwinCatholic Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:01:34 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15110#comment-29541 I really enjoyed this fisk. Perhaps it was a vicious enjoyment, but I enjoyed it. I really enjoyed this fisk. Perhaps it was a vicious enjoyment, but I enjoyed it.

]]> By: Coffee Catholic http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/23/commentary-on-a-new-york-times-opinion-piece/#comment-29540 Coffee Catholic Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:35:08 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15110#comment-29540 I think the authors need to understand that women have the *right* to keep their legs crossed and *not* be used as disposable sexual objects that are passed from man to man. But as long as Feminists continue to demand that abortion-on-demand remain legal and readily accesable they are taking this right away from women. Because guess what? Like it or not, women come under extreme pressure from men, society, *and* our so-called Feminist champions to have promiscuous sex with anyone and everyone that demands it. We are not seuxally liberated ~ we have become sexually enslaved. I think the authors need to understand that women have the *right* to keep their legs crossed and *not* be used as disposable sexual objects that are passed from man to man. But as long as Feminists continue to demand that abortion-on-demand remain legal and readily accesable they are taking this right away from women. Because guess what? Like it or not, women come under extreme pressure from men, society, *and* our so-called Feminist champions to have promiscuous sex with anyone and everyone that demands it. We are not seuxally liberated ~ we have become sexually enslaved.

]]>