<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Doctrine is Ours&#8230; Let&#039;s Take it Back!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/21/social-doctrine-is-ours-lets-take-it-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/21/social-doctrine-is-ours-lets-take-it-back/</link>
	<description>Politics and Culture from a Catholic perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:37:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here and There &#171; the other side of silence</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/21/social-doctrine-is-ours-lets-take-it-back/#comment-26070</link>
		<dc:creator>Here and There &#171; the other side of silence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15025#comment-26070</guid>
		<description>[...] Catholic&#8217;s Chris Burgwald, responding to the ongoing controversy involving the Catholic Campaign for Human Development&#8217;s ...: One of the many unfortunate aspects of “cafeteria Catholicism” in our country today is that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Catholic&#8217;s Chris Burgwald, responding to the ongoing controversy involving the Catholic Campaign for Human Development&#8217;s &#8230;: One of the many unfortunate aspects of “cafeteria Catholicism” in our country today is that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/21/social-doctrine-is-ours-lets-take-it-back/#comment-26069</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15025#comment-26069</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Thank you for the response - very helpful for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Thank you for the response &#8211; very helpful for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tito Edwards</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/21/social-doctrine-is-ours-lets-take-it-back/#comment-26068</link>
		<dc:creator>Tito Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15025#comment-26068</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m for the nuclear option.

I refuse to wait until my grandchildren get a corrective on CCHD.

By then we&#039;ll probably be the United Socialist States of America and that isn&#039;t going to happen until they pull my gun away from my dead hands!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m for the nuclear option.</p>
<p>I refuse to wait until my grandchildren get a corrective on CCHD.</p>
<p>By then we&#8217;ll probably be the United Socialist States of America and that isn&#8217;t going to happen until they pull my gun away from my dead hands!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Knight</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/21/social-doctrine-is-ours-lets-take-it-back/#comment-26067</link>
		<dc:creator>American Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15025#comment-26067</guid>
		<description>Todd,

It was not a debating snare.  No need to bite.  I think we are coming closer to some agreement.

I don&#039;t think CCHD gave any government agency money directly; however, many of the groups that received CCHD money also recieve government money.  Unlike USCCB, the money from the government doesn&#039;t come without strings (to be clear I think Catholic money should come with strings - strings that require witness to the Gospel). This effectively places our material charity in organizations with a secular-government slant, which renders the material charity devoid of true Charity.

We also agree that our government is beholden to Big Bidness; however, we disagree that it is beholden to the excess of capitalism (I take you to mean free market capitalism).  Greed is not inherant in capitalism; greed is inherent in fallen humans.  The problem is we are taught to look at capitalism and socialism as oppsities, when in fact they are twin sisters.  Socialism approaches economic and eventually total control from the angle of &#039;social justice&#039; and &#039;class struggle&#039;. Capitalism approaches from the &#039;market&#039; perspective.  Both are lies.

Socialism seeks to use social influence from the masses by promoting envy and coveting to wrest control from the &#039;merchant class&#039; and capitalism seeks to use corporate consolidation (monopoly, duopoly) to wrest control from the &#039;merhcant class&#039;.  The means both systems use is government coercion and the ends will be the same:  Absolutism, either oligarchy or dictatorship. Keep in mind Russia&#039;s errors would not have been possible without support from wealthy Western industrialists.

In that case their is no room for charity or justice.

We need to begin to approach our &#039;systemic&#039; concerns from the perspective of true, authentic Charity (Caritas, which is Love) at the most reduced level:  person to person and from there up and out respecting subsidiarity.  This keeps Charity on the level of each of us loving our neigbor in Truth and also subsidiarity is more likely to promote Justice than consolidated power and decision making do.

Authentic Human Development as expressed by the Church and most recently Papa Bene is only possible on the human level where in the institutions are subject to the human person rather than the human cog subject to the institutional machine.

Like I said, we can fall into the quagmire of partisan and ideological rhetoric (I am very guilty of that) or we can transend and find authentic ways to promote the general welfare, the common good properly understood in light of Truth, since we have the same ends in mind:  The Kingdom of Heaven.  What we must remember is that we cannot seperate the means from the ends.  We need to use His means to seek His ends becuase fallen human means and fallen human ends are hellish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,</p>
<p>It was not a debating snare.  No need to bite.  I think we are coming closer to some agreement.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think CCHD gave any government agency money directly; however, many of the groups that received CCHD money also recieve government money.  Unlike USCCB, the money from the government doesn&#8217;t come without strings (to be clear I think Catholic money should come with strings &#8211; strings that require witness to the Gospel). This effectively places our material charity in organizations with a secular-government slant, which renders the material charity devoid of true Charity.</p>
<p>We also agree that our government is beholden to Big Bidness; however, we disagree that it is beholden to the excess of capitalism (I take you to mean free market capitalism).  Greed is not inherant in capitalism; greed is inherent in fallen humans.  The problem is we are taught to look at capitalism and socialism as oppsities, when in fact they are twin sisters.  Socialism approaches economic and eventually total control from the angle of &#8216;social justice&#8217; and &#8216;class struggle&#8217;. Capitalism approaches from the &#8216;market&#8217; perspective.  Both are lies.</p>
<p>Socialism seeks to use social influence from the masses by promoting envy and coveting to wrest control from the &#8216;merchant class&#8217; and capitalism seeks to use corporate consolidation (monopoly, duopoly) to wrest control from the &#8216;merhcant class&#8217;.  The means both systems use is government coercion and the ends will be the same:  Absolutism, either oligarchy or dictatorship. Keep in mind Russia&#8217;s errors would not have been possible without support from wealthy Western industrialists.</p>
<p>In that case their is no room for charity or justice.</p>
<p>We need to begin to approach our &#8216;systemic&#8217; concerns from the perspective of true, authentic Charity (Caritas, which is Love) at the most reduced level:  person to person and from there up and out respecting subsidiarity.  This keeps Charity on the level of each of us loving our neigbor in Truth and also subsidiarity is more likely to promote Justice than consolidated power and decision making do.</p>
<p>Authentic Human Development as expressed by the Church and most recently Papa Bene is only possible on the human level where in the institutions are subject to the human person rather than the human cog subject to the institutional machine.</p>
<p>Like I said, we can fall into the quagmire of partisan and ideological rhetoric (I am very guilty of that) or we can transend and find authentic ways to promote the general welfare, the common good properly understood in light of Truth, since we have the same ends in mind:  The Kingdom of Heaven.  What we must remember is that we cannot seperate the means from the ends.  We need to use His means to seek His ends becuase fallen human means and fallen human ends are hellish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/21/social-doctrine-is-ours-lets-take-it-back/#comment-26066</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15025#comment-26066</guid>
		<description>ok, Knight, I&#039;ll bite.

Are you saying that the CCHD&#039;s problem includes government? I can&#039;t say I&#039;ve followed the list of organization grants carefully, but I didn&#039;t see any government agency on the list in my diocese.

Our government is much more beholden to the excesses of capitalism and Big Bidness than socialism.

I agree with you there are many dehumanizing forces in the world. They are much more often due to extremism that the particulars of philosophy. By themselves, socialism, federalism, capitalism, or most any other philosophy has good points rooted in what some people think to be a better way to live. The problem is when the philosophy becomes the idol and God is set aside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, Knight, I&#8217;ll bite.</p>
<p>Are you saying that the CCHD&#8217;s problem includes government? I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve followed the list of organization grants carefully, but I didn&#8217;t see any government agency on the list in my diocese.</p>
<p>Our government is much more beholden to the excesses of capitalism and Big Bidness than socialism.</p>
<p>I agree with you there are many dehumanizing forces in the world. They are much more often due to extremism that the particulars of philosophy. By themselves, socialism, federalism, capitalism, or most any other philosophy has good points rooted in what some people think to be a better way to live. The problem is when the philosophy becomes the idol and God is set aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Knight</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/21/social-doctrine-is-ours-lets-take-it-back/#comment-26065</link>
		<dc:creator>American Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=15025#comment-26065</guid>
		<description>Todd,

I appreciate the criticism.  It certainly helps in forming ideas.  Please help me a little more.  It seems that you think that &#039;government-promoting endeavor&#039; and &#039;Alinsky radical model&#039; are incompatible.  Am I right?  If so, why?  I see them as one and the same dehumanizing force - please help me clarify your thoughts.  I am not suggesting that you are wrong but I can&#039;t see a reason to agree with you.

Charity and Justice are also not mutually exclusive.  I hope I did not suggest that.  Charity, properly understood is Love.  Justice is also Love, love of God and in that love our neighbor.  I owe God justice by observing the precepts and commandments of His religion.  I owe justice to my fellow man by the same mechanism.

Charity can be taking care of the acute needs of the poor and Justice can be helping them solve the reason for their poverty.  I am confident that faithful Catholics agree on that.  Where we may disagree is on the means of how to achieve those noble goals.  The Church doesn&#039;t tell us how, and if she did she would not be infallible becuase the method is not a matter of faith or morals - the goal is.

I am not in disagreement with the stated intention of CCHD.  I am in disagreement with the means to that stated intention and also the evidence that in practice CCHD as worked to achieve the opposite ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,</p>
<p>I appreciate the criticism.  It certainly helps in forming ideas.  Please help me a little more.  It seems that you think that &#8216;government-promoting endeavor&#8217; and &#8216;Alinsky radical model&#8217; are incompatible.  Am I right?  If so, why?  I see them as one and the same dehumanizing force &#8211; please help me clarify your thoughts.  I am not suggesting that you are wrong but I can&#8217;t see a reason to agree with you.</p>
<p>Charity and Justice are also not mutually exclusive.  I hope I did not suggest that.  Charity, properly understood is Love.  Justice is also Love, love of God and in that love our neighbor.  I owe God justice by observing the precepts and commandments of His religion.  I owe justice to my fellow man by the same mechanism.</p>
<p>Charity can be taking care of the acute needs of the poor and Justice can be helping them solve the reason for their poverty.  I am confident that faithful Catholics agree on that.  Where we may disagree is on the means of how to achieve those noble goals.  The Church doesn&#8217;t tell us how, and if she did she would not be infallible becuase the method is not a matter of faith or morals &#8211; the goal is.</p>
<p>I am not in disagreement with the stated intention of CCHD.  I am in disagreement with the means to that stated intention and also the evidence that in practice CCHD as worked to achieve the opposite ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

