<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Giuliani Problem 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/20/the-giuliani-problem-2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/20/the-giuliani-problem-2-0/</link>
	<description>Politics and Culture from a Catholic perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:37:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Austin</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/20/the-giuliani-problem-2-0/#comment-29522</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=14951#comment-29522</guid>
		<description>Is not the proper term, &quot;pro-choice catholic&quot;?

The idea that the USCCB will develope a spine is the truly laughable matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is not the proper term, &#8220;pro-choice catholic&#8221;?</p>
<p>The idea that the USCCB will develope a spine is the truly laughable matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Anderson</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/20/the-giuliani-problem-2-0/#comment-29521</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=14951#comment-29521</guid>
		<description>Call me a contrarian, but I think Rudy actually has a better shot in 2012 than he did in 2008. Not that he would necessarily win the GOP nomination, but I think he would have a MUCH better showing. Especially if the GOP field of presidential prospects doesn&#039;t improve significantly between now and then.

Then it would be time to gear up another Catholics Against Rudy effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me a contrarian, but I think Rudy actually has a better shot in 2012 than he did in 2008. Not that he would necessarily win the GOP nomination, but I think he would have a MUCH better showing. Especially if the GOP field of presidential prospects doesn&#8217;t improve significantly between now and then.</p>
<p>Then it would be time to gear up another Catholics Against Rudy effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Zummo</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/20/the-giuliani-problem-2-0/#comment-29520</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Zummo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=14951#comment-29520</guid>
		<description>I think a Senator Rudy would more likely be a fairly straight-line party guy when it comes to Judges, meaning he&#039;d likely vote against the more extreme Obama selections and I doubt he&#039;d vote against any GOP selections if there is ever a GOP President during his term.

I&#039;d like to think he&#039;s smart enough to know he has no prayer of ever becoming President.  And if he did, deciding to do so by going for a Senate seat rather than the governorship is truly strange. The current occupant aside, our presidents don&#039;t come from Congress.  Then again, this is the guy who thought skipping a month&#039;s worth of primaries was a good strategy, so who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a Senator Rudy would more likely be a fairly straight-line party guy when it comes to Judges, meaning he&#8217;d likely vote against the more extreme Obama selections and I doubt he&#8217;d vote against any GOP selections if there is ever a GOP President during his term.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think he&#8217;s smart enough to know he has no prayer of ever becoming President.  And if he did, deciding to do so by going for a Senate seat rather than the governorship is truly strange. The current occupant aside, our presidents don&#8217;t come from Congress.  Then again, this is the guy who thought skipping a month&#8217;s worth of primaries was a good strategy, so who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackadder</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/20/the-giuliani-problem-2-0/#comment-29519</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackadder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=14951#comment-29519</guid>
		<description>As a Senator Giuliani wouldn&#039;t be so bad (at least he wouldn&#039;t have the power to bomb anyone). That he would run for president again after the flop of last time is just laughable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Senator Giuliani wouldn&#8217;t be so bad (at least he wouldn&#8217;t have the power to bomb anyone). That he would run for president again after the flop of last time is just laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/20/the-giuliani-problem-2-0/#comment-29518</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=14951#comment-29518</guid>
		<description>Rudy has a better chance of being struck by lightning than being President, or Senator, or Governor or dog catcher

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsiFhlvMNlA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy has a better chance of being struck by lightning than being President, or Senator, or Governor or dog catcher</p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/20/the-giuliani-problem-2-0/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/FsiFhlvMNlA/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinky</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/11/20/the-giuliani-problem-2-0/#comment-29517</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=14951#comment-29517</guid>
		<description>Giuliani would be more likely to support a pro-choice judge, all other things being equal, but he&#039;s first and foremost a law-and-order strict constructionist.  Anyway, the current holder of that Senate seat in NY is a pro-choice Catholic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giuliani would be more likely to support a pro-choice judge, all other things being equal, but he&#8217;s first and foremost a law-and-order strict constructionist.  Anyway, the current holder of that Senate seat in NY is a pro-choice Catholic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

