Comments on: Res et Explicatio for AD 8-24-2009 http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/08/24/res-et-explicatio-for-ad-8-24-2009/ Politics and Culture from a Catholic perspective. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:36:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Adios Heretics, Hello Orthodoxy! « The American Catholic http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/08/24/res-et-explicatio-for-ad-8-24-2009/#comment-32704 Adios Heretics, Hello Orthodoxy! « The American Catholic Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:39:31 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=11825#comment-32704 [...] Marxist elements of Liberation Theology[2].  This continued with Pope Benedict XVI’s Reform of the Reform by liberalizing access to the Latin Mass and his ecumenical efforts of reuniting Anglicans [...] [...] Marxist elements of Liberation Theology[2].  This continued with Pope Benedict XVI’s Reform of the Reform by liberalizing access to the Latin Mass and his ecumenical efforts of reuniting Anglicans [...]

]]> By: Res et Explicatio for AD 8-25-2009 « The American Catholic http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/08/24/res-et-explicatio-for-ad-8-24-2009/#comment-32703 Res et Explicatio for AD 8-25-2009 « The American Catholic Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:19:51 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=11825#comment-32703 [...] 5. For the last Res et Explicatio click here. [...] [...] 5. For the last Res et Explicatio click here. [...]

]]> By: e. http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/08/24/res-et-explicatio-for-ad-8-24-2009/#comment-32702 e. Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:24:40 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=11825#comment-32702 Please Taco; there's more than just that which would lead one to doubt the sham that is Medjugorje. Our Lady of Fatima it certainly is not. Please Taco; there’s more than just that which would lead one to doubt the sham that is Medjugorje.

Our Lady of Fatima it certainly is not.

]]> By: Tito Edwards http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/08/24/res-et-explicatio-for-ad-8-24-2009/#comment-32701 Tito Edwards Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:18:00 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=11825#comment-32701 Timothy, We all struggle do discern God's will, for some it's easier than others. But when the Virgin Mary tells her Medjugorje seers to join the priesthood and convent and you refuse, that is enough for me to believe that the Marian apparitions are a sham and nothing more than the devil playing these poor kids (no adults) for all their worth. Timothy,

We all struggle do discern God’s will, for some it’s easier than others.

But when the Virgin Mary tells her Medjugorje seers to join the priesthood and convent and you refuse, that is enough for me to believe that the Marian apparitions are a sham and nothing more than the devil playing these poor kids (no adults) for all their worth.

]]> By: Timothy http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/08/24/res-et-explicatio-for-ad-8-24-2009/#comment-32700 Timothy Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:05:09 +0000 http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=11825#comment-32700 Quote: "According to an interview featuring E. Michael Jones, who knew several prelates close to Medjugorje explained the contrasts on how both popes approached the issue. It seems that JP2 wanted to believe in the Marian apparitions but was hesitant due to the evidence to the contrary while Papa Bene isn’t hesitating to begin to make a ruling against the validity of these questionable apparitions." Unfortunately, Mr. Jones takes wide liberty in making statements that cannot be supported. The entire piece written by Jones is a sham and an embarrassment to him and others who promote his books and articles. Jones lacks any direct quotes and is thus left to fabricate the truth based on his skewed view of Medjugorje. Cardinal Ratzinger was involved from the beginning in removing judgement of Medjguorje from the local Bishop to the Yugoslavia Conference of Bishops and more recently to the Vatican. A more full rebuttal to Jones can be found here: http://catholic-ecclesia-dei.blogspot.com/ Quote: “According to an interview featuring E. Michael Jones, who knew several prelates close to Medjugorje explained the contrasts on how both popes approached the issue. It seems that JP2 wanted to believe in the Marian apparitions but was hesitant due to the evidence to the contrary while Papa Bene isn’t hesitating to begin to make a ruling against the validity of these questionable apparitions.”

Unfortunately, Mr. Jones takes wide liberty in making statements that cannot be supported. The entire piece written by Jones is a sham and an embarrassment to him and others who promote his books and articles. Jones lacks any direct quotes and is thus left to fabricate the truth based on his skewed view of Medjugorje. Cardinal Ratzinger was involved from the beginning in removing judgement of Medjguorje from the local Bishop to the Yugoslavia Conference of Bishops and more recently to the Vatican. A more full rebuttal to Jones can be found here:
http://catholic-ecclesia-dei.blogspot.com/

]]>