Hawaii FIVE-O

Perhaps this is a good occasion to ask if any A-C contributors contest Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate and identify themselves in any way with the birther’s movement.

The reason I ask is that a Kansas GOP congressman just yesterday used his town-hall meeting time to raise the subject as a legitimate political issue, and you are so fond of reporting with a GOP slant all of the happenings at these meetings.

That is heartening, Mr. McClarey.

This is the Coolest. TV Theme Song. Ever — although the premise of the show, if I understand correctly, was not quite accurate in that Hawaii does not have an official state police (or at least they didn’t in the 60s and 70s.)

Donald is correct in that NO A-C blogger has yet brought up the Birther controversy. I did not vote for Obama, and my distaste for his policies (particularly with regard to abortion and the economy) is second to no one’s; but I have never doubted for a minute that he IS a bona fide U.S. citizen. For one thing, anyone who requests a birth certificate anywhere in the country gets an official copy, NOT the “original” document; there is nothing suspicious or conspiratorial about that.

Also, at the time Obama was born, it was standard practice for most hospitals to announce every birth in the newspaper (as well as all hospital admissions and discharges). My brother and I, both born in the early 1960s, had birth announcements in our hometown paper, worded almost exactly the same as the birth announcements for Obama in the Honolulu newspapers — “Mr. and Mrs. Joe Doaks of 234 Elm St., Anytown, girl, Saturday, St. Mary’s.” So, unless Obama’s minions have somehow managed to perfect time travel and transport themselves back to 1961 so they could plant fake birth announcements, I’m presuming there’s nothing fishy there.

By some accounts (true or internet nonsense, do not know), Mr. Obama & assoc. have expended a six-figure sum in legal fees in resisting the release of his long form certificate. This is perplexing, if true. It is also perplexing (even if he has spent nothing) that he does not release the long form given the public controversy on this matter. The information fields in period template long-forms is quite ordinary. Working hypotheses:

1. There is a most embarrassing datum on that long form;

2. He has his finger in the dike against requests for other documentation he would rather not see the light of day;

3. He is playing the angles, allowing his opponents a distraction which makes them look foolish.