<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Margaret Sanger Was Against Abortion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/07/20/margaret-sanger-was-against-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/07/20/margaret-sanger-was-against-abortion/</link>
	<description>Politics and Culture from a Catholic perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:03:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Petrik</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/07/20/margaret-sanger-was-against-abortion/#comment-29348</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Petrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 15:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=10887#comment-29348</guid>
		<description>K,
While perhaps imprecisely phrased, I took Eric to mean that he and a fellow African-American were discussing Ms. Sanger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K,<br />
While perhaps imprecisely phrased, I took Eric to mean that he and a fellow African-American were discussing Ms. Sanger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/07/20/margaret-sanger-was-against-abortion/#comment-29347</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=10887#comment-29347</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just trying to do some research, this is the only site I&#039;ve found so far mentioning that Margaret Sanger was African-American.  The picture I see are most definetely a white women.  Where can I find the information contradictory to that?  Thank You for your insite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just trying to do some research, this is the only site I&#8217;ve found so far mentioning that Margaret Sanger was African-American.  The picture I see are most definetely a white women.  Where can I find the information contradictory to that?  Thank You for your insite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rapnsum</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/07/20/margaret-sanger-was-against-abortion/#comment-29346</link>
		<dc:creator>Rapnsum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=10887#comment-29346</guid>
		<description>Sanger supported eugenics. Several American Birth Control League board members formed the group: National Society for the Legalization of Euthanasia as early as 1938. Many of that group&#039;s founders were Sanger Board Members and joint members of the Eugenics Society, a group Planned Parenthood Founder , Margaret Sanger , belonged to as well. ( SEE NYT &quot;Sanction is sought for &#039;mercy deaths&quot; 1/17/1938). Read Sanger;s writings for yourself here: http://www.lifedynamics.com/library/ , and don&#039;t skip past her autobiography where she brags that she received a dozen invites to speak to the Klan. Sanger did admit that Life Begins At Conception - something Planned Parenthood refuses to admit today. She said that anything that stops conception was an abortion and today Plan B does that, and Planned Parenthood calls Plan B non-abortive ! Sanger and her eugenic friends thought they would be able to forcefully sterilize all they deemed &quot;unfit&quot; thus the reason they originally despised abortion. But- when the laws worked against them in that effort- suddenly abortion was a solution. And legal abortion was the answer they sought for so many years because it has proved to eliminate more Blacks than all other diseases combined. You must see a new film: MAAFA21. The documentation in that DVD will knock your socks off and convince even the skeptic that abortion and Black Genocide are an evil racist plot. check it out: www.maafa21.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanger supported eugenics. Several American Birth Control League board members formed the group: National Society for the Legalization of Euthanasia as early as 1938. Many of that group&#8217;s founders were Sanger Board Members and joint members of the Eugenics Society, a group Planned Parenthood Founder , Margaret Sanger , belonged to as well. ( SEE NYT &#8220;Sanction is sought for &#8216;mercy deaths&#8221; 1/17/1938). Read Sanger;s writings for yourself here: <a href="http://www.lifedynamics.com/library/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lifedynamics.com/library/</a> , and don&#8217;t skip past her autobiography where she brags that she received a dozen invites to speak to the Klan. Sanger did admit that Life Begins At Conception &#8211; something Planned Parenthood refuses to admit today. She said that anything that stops conception was an abortion and today Plan B does that, and Planned Parenthood calls Plan B non-abortive ! Sanger and her eugenic friends thought they would be able to forcefully sterilize all they deemed &#8220;unfit&#8221; thus the reason they originally despised abortion. But- when the laws worked against them in that effort- suddenly abortion was a solution. And legal abortion was the answer they sought for so many years because it has proved to eliminate more Blacks than all other diseases combined. You must see a new film: MAAFA21. The documentation in that DVD will knock your socks off and convince even the skeptic that abortion and Black Genocide are an evil racist plot. check it out: <a href="http://www.maafa21.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.maafa21.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cminor</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/07/20/margaret-sanger-was-against-abortion/#comment-29345</link>
		<dc:creator>cminor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=10887#comment-29345</guid>
		<description>While I couldn&#039;t say what may have been going through Sanger&#039;s mind regarding abortion, I think it is noteworthy that, from the late 19th century until the 60&#039;s or 70&#039;s the humanity of the fetus was accepted and taught in medical and nursing schools.  The concept of abortion was abhorrent to doctors and nurses who held their vocations in any honor, and not just because the procedure could be risky to the mother or because it was often a cover-up for illicit sex. If she accepted the basic scientific premise that each conception was a new human being, that can&#039;t have been an easy thing to shake off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I couldn&#8217;t say what may have been going through Sanger&#8217;s mind regarding abortion, I think it is noteworthy that, from the late 19th century until the 60&#8242;s or 70&#8242;s the humanity of the fetus was accepted and taught in medical and nursing schools.  The concept of abortion was abhorrent to doctors and nurses who held their vocations in any honor, and not just because the procedure could be risky to the mother or because it was often a cover-up for illicit sex. If she accepted the basic scientific premise that each conception was a new human being, that can&#8217;t have been an easy thing to shake off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Blosser</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/07/20/margaret-sanger-was-against-abortion/#comment-29344</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Blosser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=10887#comment-29344</guid>
		<description>One of Sanger&#039;s colleagues and contributors to her magazine once contended:

&lt;i&gt;Are Catholic stocks . . . genetically inferior to such non-Catholic libertarian stocks and Unitarians and Universal . . . Freethinkers? Inferior to non-Catholics in general? . . . my guess is that the answer will someday be made in the affirmative. . . and if the supposed differentials in net productivity are also genuine, the situation is anti-social, perhaps gravely so.&lt;/i&gt;

At that time Catholic voters composed the principle obstruction to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;her plans&lt;/a&gt;. Were it still so today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of Sanger&#8217;s colleagues and contributors to her magazine once contended:</p>
<p><i>Are Catholic stocks . . . genetically inferior to such non-Catholic libertarian stocks and Unitarians and Universal . . . Freethinkers? Inferior to non-Catholics in general? . . . my guess is that the answer will someday be made in the affirmative. . . and if the supposed differentials in net productivity are also genuine, the situation is anti-social, perhaps gravely so.</i></p>
<p>At that time Catholic voters composed the principle obstruction to <a href="http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html" rel="nofollow">her plans</a>. Were it still so today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Thoughts — A First Things Blog</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/07/20/margaret-sanger-was-against-abortion/#comment-29343</link>
		<dc:creator>First Thoughts — A First Things Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=10887#comment-29343</guid>
		<description>[...] Sanger actually thought of abortion? may, however, come as a surprise.    Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sanger actually thought of abortion? may, however, come as a surprise.    Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

