<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Res &amp; Explicatio for A.D. 4-29-2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/04/29/res-explicatio-for-ad-4-29-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/04/29/res-explicatio-for-ad-4-29-2009/</link>
	<description>Politics and Culture from a Catholic perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:06:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Res &#38; Explicatio for A.D. 5-8-2009 &#171; The American Catholic</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/04/29/res-explicatio-for-ad-4-29-2009/#comment-31779</link>
		<dc:creator>Res &#38; Explicatio for A.D. 5-8-2009 &#171; The American Catholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=7963#comment-31779</guid>
		<description>[...] 8.  For the last Res &amp; Explicatio click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8.  For the last Res &amp; Explicatio click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/04/29/res-explicatio-for-ad-4-29-2009/#comment-31778</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=7963#comment-31778</guid>
		<description>In the 13th century, the Pope placed an interdict on England forbidding any sacraments (except, I believe, baptism and annointing of the sick) there. Bishops may apply an interdict to individual persons as well, which is like an excommunication in terms of access to sacraments but without expulsion from the Catholic community. The bishop&#039;s actions may have been justified under Canon 1373.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 13th century, the Pope placed an interdict on England forbidding any sacraments (except, I believe, baptism and annointing of the sick) there. Bishops may apply an interdict to individual persons as well, which is like an excommunication in terms of access to sacraments but without expulsion from the Catholic community. The bishop&#8217;s actions may have been justified under Canon 1373.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.B.</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/04/29/res-explicatio-for-ad-4-29-2009/#comment-31777</link>
		<dc:creator>S.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=7963#comment-31777</guid>
		<description>OK, I was just talking about Michael Iafrate, who did vote for Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I was just talking about Michael Iafrate, who did vote for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awakaman</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/04/29/res-explicatio-for-ad-4-29-2009/#comment-31776</link>
		<dc:creator>awakaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=7963#comment-31776</guid>
		<description>SB:

Who I voted for or whether I voted at all is my business. . .suffice it to say I did not vote for Obama.

Secondly, please do not embarrass yourself by stating the Achoress was not a rabid supporter of Rudy Gulianni just on the Rudy G. link on the left side of her website.  The woman salavates over him so much its embarassing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SB:</p>
<p>Who I voted for or whether I voted at all is my business. . .suffice it to say I did not vote for Obama.</p>
<p>Secondly, please do not embarrass yourself by stating the Achoress was not a rabid supporter of Rudy Gulianni just on the Rudy G. link on the left side of her website.  The woman salavates over him so much its embarassing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tito Edwards</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/04/29/res-explicatio-for-ad-4-29-2009/#comment-31775</link>
		<dc:creator>Tito Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=7963#comment-31775</guid>
		<description>Inexcusable.

Voting for Obama is simply inexcusable and reveals the depth of his Catholicism which is shallow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inexcusable.</p>
<p>Voting for Obama is simply inexcusable and reveals the depth of his Catholicism which is shallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.B.</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/04/29/res-explicatio-for-ad-4-29-2009/#comment-31774</link>
		<dc:creator>S.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=7963#comment-31774</guid>
		<description>Anyway, it&#039;s funny seeing guys who voted for Obama pretending to be upset that &quot;the Anchoress&quot; might have endorsed a personally pro-choice candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s funny seeing guys who voted for Obama pretending to be upset that &#8220;the Anchoress&#8221; might have endorsed a personally pro-choice candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

