<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton and Our Lady</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/28/clinton-and-our-lady/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/28/clinton-and-our-lady/</link>
	<description>Politics and Culture from a Catholic perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:17:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary Clinton: Worst Secretary of State &#171; The American Catholic</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/28/clinton-and-our-lady/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Clinton: Worst Secretary of State &#171; The American Catholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=6559#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>[...] Our Secretary of State is such a pro-abort zealot that she doesn&#8217;t realize that lecturing Canada about &#8220;safe&#8221;, always very unsafe for at least  one of the persons involved, legal abortion might not be the best thing in the world for the top diplomat of the US to do.  I will be so glad when this worst Presidential administration in my life time is just a fading bad memory. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Our Secretary of State is such a pro-abort zealot that she doesn&#8217;t realize that lecturing Canada about &#8220;safe&#8221;, always very unsafe for at least  one of the persons involved, legal abortion might not be the best thing in the world for the top diplomat of the US to do.  I will be so glad when this worst Presidential administration in my life time is just a fading bad memory. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald R. McClarey</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/28/clinton-and-our-lady/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald R. McClarey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=6559#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Another good book on Sanger and eugenics:

http://www.amazon.com/Margaret-Sangers-Eugenic-Legacy-Fertility/dp/0786420111</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good book on Sanger and eugenics:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Margaret-Sangers-Eugenic-Legacy-Fertility/dp/0786420111" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Margaret-Sangers-Eugenic-Legacy-Fertility/dp/0786420111</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald R. McClarey</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/28/clinton-and-our-lady/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald R. McClarey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=6559#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>Here is a review of the book by Wesley J. Smith:

http://www.waragainsttheweak.com/offSiteArchive/www.nationalreview.com/index.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a review of the book by Wesley J. Smith:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.waragainsttheweak.com/offSiteArchive/www.nationalreview.com/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.waragainsttheweak.com/offSiteArchive/www.nationalreview.com/index.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald R. McClarey</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/28/clinton-and-our-lady/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald R. McClarey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=6559#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>A good book in regard to Sanger and her role in the American eugenics movement is War Against the Weak.

http://www.amazon.com/War-Against-Weak-Eugenics-Americas/dp/0914153064/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1238497600&amp;sr=1-2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good book in regard to Sanger and her role in the American eugenics movement is War Against the Weak.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/War-Against-Weak-Eugenics-Americas/dp/0914153064/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1238497600&#038;sr=1-2" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/War-Against-Weak-Eugenics-Americas/dp/0914153064/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1238497600&#038;sr=1-2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/28/clinton-and-our-lady/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=6559#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>To wrap up my earlier tangent on Margaret Sanger&#039;s alleged racism: a quick Google search on this topic turns up several interesting articles.

Planned Parenthood of New Jersey has an article devoted to this topic. Of course it is meant to be sympathetic to Sanger, but it does point out that some of the most offensive quotes often attributed to her (such as &quot;the most merciful thing a large family does to one of its children is to kill it&quot;) appear to have been either wrongly attributed or taken grossly out of context. This does not surprise me as many historical figures and celebrities (from Lincoln to Einstein) are often misquoted or assumed to have said things they never really said.

The Wikipedia entry on Sanger notes her controversial racial views as well as the fact that they were shared by a lot of people at the time. It also notes, however, that she did not approve of the state-enforced Nazi eugenics program. She did once address a KKK women&#039;s group (in the 1920s the Klan was at the height of its popularity and was known just as much for its anti-Catholic and anti-immigrant views as its racial views) but found it to be a strange and rather disturbing experience.

Interestingly, according to Wikipedia, she also made comments acknowledging that abortion was killing a baby and that she intended for contraception to reduce the incidence of abortion.

Whether Sanger&#039;s &quot;Negro Project&quot; was a consciously and deceptively racist effort to reduce the black population or simply an attempt to give black women the same &quot;right&quot; to control the size of their families as white women had, was and still is a matter of debate, particularly among African-Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To wrap up my earlier tangent on Margaret Sanger&#8217;s alleged racism: a quick Google search on this topic turns up several interesting articles.</p>
<p>Planned Parenthood of New Jersey has an article devoted to this topic. Of course it is meant to be sympathetic to Sanger, but it does point out that some of the most offensive quotes often attributed to her (such as &#8220;the most merciful thing a large family does to one of its children is to kill it&#8221;) appear to have been either wrongly attributed or taken grossly out of context. This does not surprise me as many historical figures and celebrities (from Lincoln to Einstein) are often misquoted or assumed to have said things they never really said.</p>
<p>The Wikipedia entry on Sanger notes her controversial racial views as well as the fact that they were shared by a lot of people at the time. It also notes, however, that she did not approve of the state-enforced Nazi eugenics program. She did once address a KKK women&#8217;s group (in the 1920s the Klan was at the height of its popularity and was known just as much for its anti-Catholic and anti-immigrant views as its racial views) but found it to be a strange and rather disturbing experience.</p>
<p>Interestingly, according to Wikipedia, she also made comments acknowledging that abortion was killing a baby and that she intended for contraception to reduce the incidence of abortion.</p>
<p>Whether Sanger&#8217;s &#8220;Negro Project&#8221; was a consciously and deceptively racist effort to reduce the black population or simply an attempt to give black women the same &#8220;right&#8221; to control the size of their families as white women had, was and still is a matter of debate, particularly among African-Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/28/clinton-and-our-lady/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=6559#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>&quot;De rien&quot; as the frenchman will say...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;De rien&#8221; as the frenchman will say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

