<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/06/second-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/06/second-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Politics and Culture from a Catholic perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarwinCatholic</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/06/second-thoughts/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>DarwinCatholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=5482#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>The Brooks and Buckley self deceptions and revelations strike me as fulfilling the dictum that, &quot;You have to be terribly smart to be this stupid.&quot;

Reading Brooks&#039; latest piece, I noted especially, &quot;The White House folks didn’t say this, but I got the impression they’d be willing to raise taxes on the bottom 95 percent.&quot;  It strikes me, actually, that their very reassurances give credence to Ross Douthat&#039;s suggestion that the Obama budget consists of a sort of reverse &quot;starve the beast&quot; approach -- in which Obama hopes to get people hooked on a higher baseline of government services before the great fiscal reckoning when we realize we need to either cut spending or raise taxes.  The idea being: If he can get people hooked on broad programs now without figuring out how to pay for them, he can then push through the &quot;necessary&quot; tax increases to pay for them later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Brooks and Buckley self deceptions and revelations strike me as fulfilling the dictum that, &#8220;You have to be terribly smart to be this stupid.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reading Brooks&#8217; latest piece, I noted especially, &#8220;The White House folks didn’t say this, but I got the impression they’d be willing to raise taxes on the bottom 95 percent.&#8221;  It strikes me, actually, that their very reassurances give credence to Ross Douthat&#8217;s suggestion that the Obama budget consists of a sort of reverse &#8220;starve the beast&#8221; approach &#8212; in which Obama hopes to get people hooked on a higher baseline of government services before the great fiscal reckoning when we realize we need to either cut spending or raise taxes.  The idea being: If he can get people hooked on broad programs now without figuring out how to pay for them, he can then push through the &#8220;necessary&#8221; tax increases to pay for them later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Harkins</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/03/06/second-thoughts/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Harkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=5482#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>As for the third thoughts, I&#039;d be highly comforted, too, if I just went by those assuring statements from the administration.  However, I don&#039;t think it is overly cynical to doubt both the effectiveness of those statements, if they are made honestly, or even the honesty of those statements.  I lean towards doubt on effectiveness; I think that Obama and his ilk mean well, but that&#039;s hardly soothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the third thoughts, I&#8217;d be highly comforted, too, if I just went by those assuring statements from the administration.  However, I don&#8217;t think it is overly cynical to doubt both the effectiveness of those statements, if they are made honestly, or even the honesty of those statements.  I lean towards doubt on effectiveness; I think that Obama and his ilk mean well, but that&#8217;s hardly soothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

