There Is Hope For The Church In America

I came across this and as a pro-life Catholic Democrat, I am very, very pleased with this. If only every Bishop in the United States responded in this way when Catholic elected officials in their diocese improperly reflected church teaching in their voting. Thank you Bishop Martino of Scranton, Pennsylvania!

The full text of the letter:

Dear Senator Casey:

I wish to thank you for voting in favor of the Hatch Amendment to the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reorganization Act of 2009 which would have made unborn children eligible for child health assistance had it passed. I am grateful for what you have done on behalf of children in America who are without health care.

It is with deep regret, however, that I learned of your vote against the amendment offered by Senator Mel Martinez (R-FL) to the same Children’s Health Insurance Act. Senator Martinez’s amendment would have reinstated the Mexico City Policy. That policy, instituted in 1984, required foreign non-governmental organizations “to agree as a condition of their receipt of [U.S.] federal funds” that they would “neither perform nor actively promote abortion as a method of family planning . . . .” It also prohibited them from lobbying governments to make abortion legal. In effect, the reversal of the Mexico City policy will mean that over 450 million dollars of American foreign aid will go to organizations that are militant in promoting abortion as a method of population control, particularly in countries that find abortion objectionable on moral grounds. Senator, is not this vote a contradiction of your repeated claim that you support the protection of unborn life? [my emphasis]

Contrary to a release issued by your office yesterday, the 1973 Helms Amendment does not provide the same restrictions as the Mexico City Policy. The Helms Amendment prohibits only U.S. funds from being used to pay for abortions or to motivate or coerce anyone to practice abortions. It in no way keeps U.S. federal funds from organizations which use their own money to pay for or support abortions. Nor does it place restrictions on organizations that lobby foreign governments to reverse anti-abortion laws. While I understand that the Helms Amendment is still in place, it does not have the same effect in limiting abortions abroad.

On Respect Life Sunday, October 5, I addressed the faithful of the Diocese of Scranton. In keeping with the obligations of my episcopal office, I called upon my brothers and sisters in faith to be vigilant against the objections to the Church’s teaching on life so prevalent in current political discourse. I vowed to be vigilant in correcting Catholics who are in error with regard to the sanctity of life. Your vote against the Mexico City Policy will mean the deaths of thousands of unborn children. This is an offense against life and a denial of our Catholic teaching on the dignity of every human being. This action is worthy of condemnation by all moral men and women. [my emphasis]

Your release also says that you support “family planning . . . specifically because reducing unintended pregnancies reduces the number of abortions.” I remind you that it is never permissible to use immoral means (e.g., artificial contraception) to achieve a good end.

As I have done on several occasions, Senator, I urge you to consider that Church documents speak clearly and compellingly on the special responsibility that falls to you as a lawmaker to oppose abortion and other clear evils, including contraception, infanticide, euthanasia and embryonic stem-cell research. To that end, I refer you to two documents:

1. Doctrinal Note on some questions regarding The Participation of Catholics in Political Life. It says, “Catholics . . . have the right and the duty to recall society to a deeper understanding of human life and to the responsibility of everyone in this regard. John Paul II, continuing the constant teaching of the Church, has reiterated many times that those who are directly involved in lawmaking bodies have a ‘grave and clear obligation to oppose’ any law that attacks human life.”

2. Christifideles Laici. It states, “If, indeed everyone has the mission and responsibility of acknowledging the personal dignity of every human being and of defending the right to life, some lay faithful are given a particular title to this task: such as parents, teachers, health workers and those who hold economic and political power.”

I remind you further that when he was Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Ratzinger sent a memo to the bishops of the United States advising them that advocacy of, or participation in, abortion and euthanasia can never be justified by invoking respect for the freedom of others or by appealing to the fact that civil law permits or requires it. He said there can be no diversity of opinion among Catholics regarding abortion and euthanasia.

It is my deepest wish, Senator, to convince you of the necessity of rescinding your vote on the Martinez Amendment. It is the height of irony that this amendment was defeated while the Senate passed legislation to provide health insurance for children who would otherwise be without it. What hypocrisy offers health insurance to children in one part of the world when children in another part will be deprived, by the stroke of the same pen, of their first breath?

I recognize and respect the burdens that you bear as a United States Senator; however, I remind you that your responsibilities as a Catholic bound by the faith of the Church exceed even those of your office. Your failure to reverse this vote will regrettably mean that you persist formally in cooperating with the evil brought about by this hideous and unnecessary policy.

As I have done several times before, I offer to make myself available to you to discuss the grave concerns that I raise here.

Sincerely yours in Christ,

Most Reverend Joseph F. Martino, D.D., Hist. E.D. Bishop of Scranton

5 Responses to There Is Hope For The Church In America

  • Gerard E. says:

    Very, very, very nice. The first brushback pitch, high and tight, to a Dem official by a Shepherd. Sure enough it would be our own Bishop Martino, a Philly Guy doing great work a few hundred miles north. Kinda reminding the Senator, like Lloyd Bentsen to Dan Quayle- I knew Bob Casey, and you’re no Bob Casey. Sort of a jab that Bob Sr. loved the little babies born and unborn. And that Bob Jr. is still trying to hard to appease his Senate masters. So preserving some kids’ lives not a great idea if all kids aren’t protected, as the Good Bishop notes. My Spider Sense tells me there will be a whole bunch of major Sees with vacancies coming up shortly. Looks like Cardinal Egan will hanging up his zucetto in The Apple. Over in El Lay, federal probe into alleged stonewalling of dysfunctional archdiocesan priests’ activities could mean trouble with a capital T for Mahony. Cardinal George, good as he is, is up in years, in bad health, weary from battles with dissident priests, now has to rebuild Holy Name Cathedral following mid-week fire. Meaning- Attention Vatican Types- keep our good Bishop Martino in the mix when these, and other big jobs in Sun Belt cities, come to pass. Send him a red hat as a bonus.

  • If only every Bishop in the United States responded in this way when Catholic elected officials in their diocese improperly reflected church teaching in their voting.

    As I have done several times before…

    Actually, if every bishop only did this, we wouldn’t have a different situation at all. When will Sen. Casey actually have a consequence to his pro-abortion voting?

  • Matt McDonald says:

    Paul,

    A letter this strong, and public is action in itself. It has serious consequences for Casey, both morally, and politically. The bishop has knowingly painted himself into a corner, if Casey does not change his ways (which he won’t) and the bishop fails to take canonical action he will shown to be nothing but a blowhard. I highly doubt this shepherd will allow that to happen, especially with the strong support he is getting from the Holy See.

  • Donald R. McClarey says:

    Casey the Lesser is a poor excuse for a Senator and an even poorer excuse for a pro-lifer. His dad was a pro-life hero; the son is a political hack.

Follow TAC by Clicking on the Buttons Below
Bookmark and Share
Subscribe by eMail

Enter your email:

Recent Comments
Archives
Our Visitors. . .
Our Subscribers. . .