<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CDF to Offer Personal Prelature Status to the Traditional Anglican Communion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/01/29/personal-prelature-for-traditional-anglican-communion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/01/29/personal-prelature-for-traditional-anglican-communion/</link>
	<description>Politics and Culture from a Catholic perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:17:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waiting</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/01/29/personal-prelature-for-traditional-anglican-communion/#comment-31039</link>
		<dc:creator>Waiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=4061#comment-31039</guid>
		<description>Its interesting Msgr. Langham is reported as conceding that &quot;the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith could be involved in talks with the Traditional Anglican Communion.&quot;

There is no secret here, it has been open from the first whom we are working with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting Msgr. Langham is reported as conceding that &#8220;the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith could be involved in talks with the Traditional Anglican Communion.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is no secret here, it has been open from the first whom we are working with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waiting</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/01/29/personal-prelature-for-traditional-anglican-communion/#comment-31038</link>
		<dc:creator>Waiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=4061#comment-31038</guid>
		<description>Fr. Bosco keeps worrying about conversion.  Why do you suppose this matter has consistently bypassed the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity?

Why has it been allowed to deal exclusively with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith?

It is because there is not a difference of  belief.  We would not be allowed to follow the path we have, if our beliefs were different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fr. Bosco keeps worrying about conversion.  Why do you suppose this matter has consistently bypassed the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity?</p>
<p>Why has it been allowed to deal exclusively with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith?</p>
<p>It is because there is not a difference of  belief.  We would not be allowed to follow the path we have, if our beliefs were different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McDonald</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/01/29/personal-prelature-for-traditional-anglican-communion/#comment-31037</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=4061#comment-31037</guid>
		<description>Fr Peters,

my comment in no way conflicts with the reality that conversion is individual.  For those already in the Church, conversion is still required.

&lt;i&gt;“&lt;b&gt;We have not been informed that this is going to happen&lt;/b&gt;; maybe the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is more informed but we have not received any update,” he said. “All we know is what we have read on newspapers and on some blogs.”&lt;/i&gt;

That is a denial of nothing, as it&#039;s likely the Holy Father would be holding his cards close, and quite possibly using his former congregation to execute.

Fr. Peter&#039;s comments notwithstanding, there is significant precedence of the Church welcoming large organized groups back into the fold after working out conditions with their leaders.   Likely the first was the Arians after the Council of Nicea.

Please Fr., what is the reason for your pessimism in this matter? Are you for some reason opposed to this re-union?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fr Peters,</p>
<p>my comment in no way conflicts with the reality that conversion is individual.  For those already in the Church, conversion is still required.</p>
<p><i>“<b>We have not been informed that this is going to happen</b>; maybe the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is more informed but we have not received any update,” he said. “All we know is what we have read on newspapers and on some blogs.”</i></p>
<p>That is a denial of nothing, as it&#8217;s likely the Holy Father would be holding his cards close, and quite possibly using his former congregation to execute.</p>
<p>Fr. Peter&#8217;s comments notwithstanding, there is significant precedence of the Church welcoming large organized groups back into the fold after working out conditions with their leaders.   Likely the first was the Arians after the Council of Nicea.</p>
<p>Please Fr., what is the reason for your pessimism in this matter? Are you for some reason opposed to this re-union?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr Bosco Peters</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/01/29/personal-prelature-for-traditional-anglican-communion/#comment-31036</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr Bosco Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=4061#comment-31036</guid>
		<description>Conversion is individually, Matt&#039;s comment notwithstanding,
see:
http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=1865</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conversion is individually, Matt&#8217;s comment notwithstanding,<br />
see:<br />
<a href="http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=1865" rel="nofollow">http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=1865</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McDonald</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/01/29/personal-prelature-for-traditional-anglican-communion/#comment-31035</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=4061#comment-31035</guid>
		<description>Fr. Peters,

according to statements by members of TAC above, and the US website, there are no preconditions on the offer to join full communion with the Church.  They accepted the Catechism in it&#039;s entirety, and have, apparently agreed to abide by any instructions from the Holy See with regard to their entry into the Church.

As you are surely aware, the Church has welcomed her separated brethren from the Anglican communion before.  A process was established whereby their priests where accepted to seminaries and ordained, even if currently married.  There&#039;s no doubt that a similar process would occur in this case, although it seems virtually impossible that any would be ordained to the episcopate.

As to the personal moral situation of the TAC priests and bishops, that is no reason to turn the lost sheep away? I trust the Holy Father will deal with them as a true shepherd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fr. Peters,</p>
<p>according to statements by members of TAC above, and the US website, there are no preconditions on the offer to join full communion with the Church.  They accepted the Catechism in it&#8217;s entirety, and have, apparently agreed to abide by any instructions from the Holy See with regard to their entry into the Church.</p>
<p>As you are surely aware, the Church has welcomed her separated brethren from the Anglican communion before.  A process was established whereby their priests where accepted to seminaries and ordained, even if currently married.  There&#8217;s no doubt that a similar process would occur in this case, although it seems virtually impossible that any would be ordained to the episcopate.</p>
<p>As to the personal moral situation of the TAC priests and bishops, that is no reason to turn the lost sheep away? I trust the Holy Father will deal with them as a true shepherd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr Bosco Peters</title>
		<link>http://the-american-catholic.com/2009/01/29/personal-prelature-for-traditional-anglican-communion/#comment-31034</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr Bosco Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-american-catholic.com/?p=4061#comment-31034</guid>
		<description>What are the odds?
Maybe when there is a married woman pope?
http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/anglican-personal-prelature/467</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the odds?<br />
Maybe when there is a married woman pope?<br />
<a href="http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/anglican-personal-prelature/467" rel="nofollow">http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/anglican-personal-prelature/467</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

